Saturday, June 16, 2012

EUROPEAN FINANCIAL CRISIS NEXT DEVELOPMENTS


EUROPEAN FINANCIAL CRISIS NEXT DEVELOPMENTS

 Very few options exist which could  resolve the problems and put the EU countries back onto a sustainable  future course.
The likely immediate steps to be taken, mainly by the ECB, which are cosmetic in impact and also appearance include, limited amounts of bond buying, a symbolic lowering of interest rates, adding token amounts to existing bail out funds, perhaps limited  ECB liquidity injections. The purpose of this incremental idiocy is to create the illusion of action when in reality the global situation is probably still deteriorating. It does however keep Mr. Draghi on the front page of the newspapers.
The amounts involved will be probably in EUR 100 Billion tranches, because nobody will dare say that the problem is in EUR Trillions.
The reality is that European politicians and the electorate still want to have their cake and eat it. They wish to retain national sovereignty and remain in the Euro zone, and not to suffer austerity while receiving hand outs. It is likely matters will need to get very much worse before the political elites, completely removed from the ordinary citizen’s reality, will get the message. Regrettably it will be the bond markets which will put an end to this game of make believe.
By the time they do the options will probably be down to the following:
  • Full fiscal integration and loss of sovereignty for those that stay in the Euro zone, with the agreement signed in a railway carriage in Compiegne. For Germany “all things come to he who waits”
  • Exit for all countries not willing to sign up to the new regime, hopefully when an orderly exit is still an option
The wild card possibility is that Germany exits the Euro zone taking perhaps a few Northern European neighbors with it.
While it is virtually impossible to predict the outcome, the only certainty with our completely incompetent leadership, is when the inevitable comes it will be an absolute catastrophe.
However the cake is sliced and diced, I do not believe the Euro zone will be intact at the end of this year. The question is how this will impact our lives. Many will unfortunately find themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time.
The theme of my next blog will be how can we thrive and survive in the resulting chaos


THE ECONOMIC CRISIS IN EUROPE HAS REACHED A CROSSROADS



The economic crisis in Europe has reached a crossroads, from which in all probability there is no return. The past many months have been empty debate when the situation has further deteriorated.

Governments depend for their financing on the sovereign bond markets, where they can refinance existing debt, and raise new debt caused  by deficit spending. Today bond investors are shunning these sovereign bond markets as they see unacceptably high risk or are asking interest rates that are so high as to be unaffordable for governments with mountainous debt levels.The Greek bail out and the cram down of bond holders also added a new element of risk that any new money from the Bail out funds would have a preferred status, thus driving away even more  bond investors. In short the bond market has taken away from the politicians the control over the situation as regrettably was forseen by many observers for years.

A similar situation exists for weaker banks, which can no longer raise equity capital and long term bond financing. Thereafter they  turn to their governments for assistance, which as explained above,  they are no longer capable of providing. Such banks are also shut out of the interbank short term financing market, where banks lend to each other. The degree of mistrust between banks is so great, that instead of lending to each other, stronger banks park their cash with the ECB. The amounts involved are staggering, recently approaching   EUR 800 Billion. The cash starved banks can obtain finance from the ECB but only on presenting  valid security for these loans. We have now reached the stage that these banks have pledged virtually all their assets already, and can offer no security in exchange for more cash. The famous LTRO of EUR 700 Billion last year enabled weak banks access cash, but doomed them in the market, where their share price collapsed, as it was a flagrant proof of weakness. Also when the bank used the cash to buy their sovereign bonds, the market now knows the further losses they incurred. For all these reasons a further LTRO 2 looks very unattractive.

Thus we have reached the stage where both soverign countries and their major banks have reached the limit of their borrowing capacities when their actual borrowing requirement increases exponentially, and as explained above the EU and ECB interventions while creating a short term fix have made matters even worse.

Although this crisis has been many years in the making, historians may well come to regard the weekend of the French and Greek elections as the turning point.

Mr Hollande was elected on a platform of reducing retirement age, giving sweet deals to bureaucrats, increasing spending to generate growth, and using other people’s money to pay for it. This of course appealed so much to the French electorate that Mr Hollande a man who has never  held ministrerial office, has taken the reins in France’s most difficult hour. He looks set to consolidate the socialist party power in this weekend’s local elections.

Meanwhile in Greece, the polarisation in politics has cannibalised the centre left and right parties and is making way for irreconcilable extremes. Austerity has slashed living standards for the ordinary Greek citizen, while many abusive anomolies remain. In hospitals the situation is so desperate that Cancer patients are no longer getting medication and the most basic hospital supplies are either rationed or not available. Many state employees have simply not been paid, and private businesses are shuttering their premises.

There is an election this weekend and at this stage it is to be hoped that whatever the errors of the past the country remains governable and does not degenerate into anarchy.

The financial situation in Greece has been debated to death. The economy is contracting, while the tax revenues are dwindling. The monies handed over to Greece have essentially been recycled  to bail out of the insolvent banks in Northern Europe. Virtually nothing remains in Greece. When the Greeks do not wish to play the game of getting even more indebted,  it was even proposed to hand the cash directly to the banks and send the Greek government the bill.

In Spain the true situation is increasingly coming to the surface. Firstly Prime Minister Rajoy said that Spanish banks had no problems and did not need any financial assistance, secondly Bankia reported a profit and a few days announced  later a whacking multibillion loss. Then Mr Rajoy reaffirmed that the problem could be handled in Spain, and a few days later went cap in hand for a EUR 100 Billion bail out, for the banking sector only.

Informed sources estimate the banking bail out, to cover primarily real estate losses,  alone should be of the order of EUR 400 Billion Then there is the problem of spendthrift out of control regions, and the funding of the massive social security commitments of a country where youth unemployment is running at over 50%. Stopping the latter payments could lead very rapidly to serious social unrest.

Spain has  in addition substantial commitments to various EU solidarity funds and also to the ECB. Estimates of its true Debt/GDP ratio is closer to an unviable 120%, pre bank bail out, to which should be added the projected deficits for the coming years

This is reflected in Spain’s cost of 10 yr borrowing at around 7% in today’s market. This is reported as excessive, which is simply not true,  When Spain borrowed in Peseta’s, interest rates were  much higher, which curtailed the borrowings.. Debt levels are the real problem.

In Italy where the EU nominated  Mr Monti to became technocratic Prime Minister, the situation is equally grim. The debt/GDP is approximately 180% but at least Italy does not have a colossal real estate bubble. However their banks also have shaky balance sheets and the economy very weak.

Italy also has  significant contingent liabilites to EU solidarity funds.and also to the ECB.

The inherent risks are reflected in 10 yr borrowing costs only slightly lower than Spain

In the past the commitments and contingent liabilites were never really considered by Governments as cash liabilities as nobody foresaw that they would ever be used. This is rather like an insurance company not collecting a premium and never expecting to have a claim. Now however all the signs are that each and every one will be called to the full and there is absolutely no cash availaible to meet these demands.

Each country has  also realised that the sooner you get in line for a bail out, the better your chances of not being asked to contribute to another country’s bail out.

The quickest way to achieve this is to make sure one of the country’s too big to fail banks has a run on funds, a crashing share price and is on the edge of bankruptcy. At that point the Government will promise to bail out the bank and run cap in hand to the EU for funding, and announce oh by the way we also need cash for the other banks.

Spain has outmaneuvred Italy very effectively leaving Mr Monti fuming. When the Austrian finance minister suggested that Italy may be next, he furiously denied it. “Methinks he doth protest too much” – Shakespeare

We are also seeing Slovenia and Cyprus threatening to join the queue

What Monti does know is that with Greece, Portugal, Ireland, and Spain and potentially Slovenia and Cyprus out of the game the burden falls on those left standing. Italy on its own may just survive but is in no position to shoulder its share of the burden imposed by others.

Thereafter France with high Debt/GDP ratio, increasing deficit spending, massive EU  contingent liabilities, and  its domestic banks overcommitted to Spain, Italy and Greece, could go under overnight. Mrs Merkell has strongly criticised France today for its present policies as she rightly fears a situation where France, instead of being an ally becomes yet one more liability. 

There is  no way Germany virtually alone could redress the situation. The amounts of money required to rectify the situation are vast. Germany would have to take on massive debt burdens much higher interest costs and lower its standard of living to that of the EU average, while continuing to work much harder and being far more productive. This is a tough sell to a teutonic electorate, already  widely disliked by those they would help.

The extraordinary thing, never mentioned by the EU political elites, is that even if the slate were wiped clean, the imbalances which created this mess, differing productivity, same exchange rate, same interest rate for all, would create the problem all over again.



In summary, sovereign states have  run out of cash simultaneously  and cannot access the credit markets on acceptable terms for the amounts needed. The major banks with few exceptions are in the same situation.

The EU rescue mechanisms ESM/EFSF  meant to save individual states in difficulty are largely unfunded, and there is no legal and political agreement as to how the funds should be deployed. Even if totally funded  they are perhaps adequate to deal with Greece and Portugal,  but are completely completely overwhelmed by the scale of the problem posed by Spain, Italy et al.

This in financial parlace is “Contagion” but in reality  it simple arithmetic. These numbers have been known for years. The problem is that the philosophy of “extend and pretend “ so loved by politicians, has its limits.  Ultimately it transitions into “lie until you die”  which is where we are today.

The problem has never been Greece despite all one reads in the media, contagion has always been the problem. Contagion can only happen when all the others are only slightly stronger than the weakest link.

At some point very soon this festering situation has to explode and when it does Europe and probably the world will never be the same again. 

Sunday, January 29, 2012

CURRENCY WARS ARE REAL WARS

CURRENCY WARS ARE REAL WARS

John Connally, US Secretary to the Treasury under President Nixon, in 1971, famously remarked to a group of European Finance ministers worried about the US exporting inflation via the dollar; “it’s our currency but your problem”. He also supported the US running an annual budget deficit of USD 50 Billion, would you believe, to stimulate the economy.

Apart from the fact a USD 50 Billion deficit these days lasts about 2 weeks, not much has changed. The USD is still the reserve currency and the US Treasury knows very well the power that this gives to export inflation world wide.

When the USD is no longer the reserve currency in which almost all international trade is conducted, the demand for USD will collapse, as will the exchange rate, and the inflation that the US currently exports, will come home to roost big time.

This has a direct implication in the current stand off with Iran. America made Iran into the region’s most powerful country, thanks mainly to the US the military industrial machine’s decision to invade and destroy Iraq. Iran’s oppressive regime, their implacable hatred for Israel and their thinly disguised bid to acquire nuclear weapons, is clearly not acceptable to the Western powers.

The saber rattling between the US and Iran, notably with Iran having military exercises in the straits of Hormuz, and the US having at one point three aircraft carriers in the region, have been getting a lot of attention by the international press and military strategists alike.

However the real war in the region is not seen by the general public and scarcely talked about in the press. It is a currency war.

The sanctions against Iran, apart from the depriving the ordinary citizen of basic essentials of life, include freezing of Iran’s central bank assets, principally USD received on the sale of oil, by far the country’s major export.

The impact of this has created massive overnight inflation, with black market exchange rates to USD skyrocketing. This means that all imports, from motor cars to washing machines, to food staples and medical supplies, have rocketed in price. This forces a significant sector of the population below the poverty level, and deprives the middle class of their hard earned standard of living. Clearly the purpose of sanctions is to foment enough internal misery, starvation and discontent to destabilize the country. In effect the west has already declared a clandestine war on Iran, and is waiting for them to lash out in order for the west to say we retaliated to an act of aggression.

However, unlike Iraq, which was put into a similar situation, Iran has a number of powerful allies, who do not want Iran to fall into the western sphere of influence. They include China, India and Russia, who understand the game perfectly well.

Iran supplies the majority of its oil to these countries, versus about 20% to Europe, and the last thing any of them want is for the US to have control over their supply.

A bomb shell was announced this week when Iran agreed with India to accept payment of oil in gold and not in USD. China and Russia are likely to follow and they are also receiving cooperation from Turkish banks, effectively by passing the western currency embargo.

Physical gold cannot be blocked in a New York bank account. President Chavez understood this perfectly when he insisted on taking physical delivery in Venezuela of the country’s gold reserves, much to the chagrin of the US in particular.

This move is of enormous significance, as in parallel, major trading partners such as China, Russia, India and Japan are creating payment arrangements which bypass the USD.  It is extremely bullish for Gold and very bad news for the USD whose dominance of USD denominated world trade suffered a major blow.

This may even be the turning point in the decline of the USD’s importance in world trade.

Through these acts of economic aggression, the US and the west have probably polarized not only the Middle East but also aligned against them a formidable grouping of economically powerful countries, who felt their vital interests were being threatened.

Currency wars are every bit as real as shooting wars, and for the moment Iran has played their cards rather well.


YOUR CENTRAL BANK NEEDS YOU

YOUR CENTRAL BANK NEEDS YOU

The key difference between a Central Bank and a normal Bank is the capability to print money.  The euphemistic term is Quantitative Easing “QE” frequently cited by the Ben Bernanke and Sir Mervyn King, generally with a straight face, as though this were the panacea for all our troubles.

Other expressions, such as the bank acting as a “lender of last resort”, also sounds pretty good, almost as though some “Godfather” of the financial  world was deploying small part of its vast resources to back stop to all problems.

This is however like the financial world’s equivalent of the Orwellian “Ministry of Truth” pumping out propaganda and lies.   

The reality is that quantitative easing is creating money out of thin air, and lender of last resort is creating money to lend to financial institutions, to which no-one in their right mind would ever contemplate giving a penny. In addition the only Godfather behind all this is you the taxpayer and your children and grandchildren.

Recent years have seen an unprecedented explosion of “assets” central bank balance sheets. The 2007 pre-crisis combined balance sheets of the major European central banks; Bank of England; Bank of France Bundesbank and Swiss National Bank, totaled approximately USD 550 Billion. Today it has become USD 2,700 Billion, a five times increase in 4 years.

In much simplified terms, central banks main assets are composed of cash in local and foreign currencies, investments in government bonds, loans to financial institutions and holdings of gold and precious metals.

This colossal explosion in the “assets” held by central banks is paid for by money conjured up out of no-where, by an electronic printing machine. You too can do this at home, but that would be considered counterfeiting, and you could go to jail for debasing the currency. Only Central Bankers are allowed to hit the “Control P” button on their PC with impunity.

This expansion is a global phenomenon. In the same period the balance sheets of the Fed; ECB; Bank of Japan and Bank of China have expanded from USD 7,000 Billion to USD 15,000 Billion approximately.

For the lucky Europeans, we are now the proud owners of Greek, Portuguese and other bonds taken off the market because nobody else wanted them. Our central banks have loaned money to illiquid and insolvent banks, which if capitalist market forces had been allowed to work, would have gone bankrupt a long time ago.

Equally, if the investments held by these Central Banks were marked to market all the central banks, whose capital and reserves are minimal compared to their total balance sheets, would be totally wiped out. They are more leveraged than hedge funds, and more bankrupt than Enron or MF Global.

So what solutions do these geniuses of economics and finance have to propose? Why of course more of the same. Like a chorus in unison, from Washington, Mme Lagarde, Sir Mervyn King, Mario Draghi,  like a collection of Globalist Oliver Twists all “want some more”, many, many  trillions more.

The new money will be used to loan to bankrupt banks, which in turn will buy the bonds of bankrupt countries, to keep the system going a bit longer. This will also  ensure that when the collapse comes, the irrecoverable trillions of assets will be on the central banks balance sheet, and the losses will be for the taxpayer, while banks which created the mess will escape.

So let us consider a moment Greece. In order for their bail out to be approved and the ECB; IMF etc to purchase their defaulting bonds, plus the new bonds to be issued, the latest proposed preconditions are, that they pay bondholders creditors first (e.g. before paying old age pensions, the police force, the military and hospital staff).
In addition,  they should cede their fiscal sovereignty and control over sale of state assets; de facto give up their state sovereignty.

In exchange Mr Draghi and Ms Lagarde will hit the “control P” button on their PC for a few seconds, dump the risk relating to this new debt on the Global taxpayer, while the banks get their principal and interest reimbursed in full.


I have said before Greece should default and leave the Euro zone. If ever there was a moment to do so it is now. They should reject banker occupation and bureaucratic dictatorship. They should give a clear lead to other countries, Portugal, Spain, Italy etc. that it is better to suffer and be free than live as multi generational debt slaves. 




Wednesday, January 25, 2012

THE BEST PRESIDENT MONEY CAN BUY

THE BEST PRESIDENT MONEY CAN BUY

A reader of my Blog entitled “SEC Regulators or Resetters”, suggested I took a closer look at the correlation between  the most fraudulent banks league table, and those same institutions overall contributions to the Presidential campaign of Obama and McCain in 2008.






SEC
TOTAL
BANK
Description of Fraud

Penalty
USD 000







UBS               
Offshore Banking services tax fraud
Fined
780,000
Goldman        
Civil Fraud (SEC cut - USD 300 Million)
Fined
550,000
Citi                
Bubble Securities


Fined
285,000
J P Morgan       
Mortgage securities

Fined
154,000






1,769,000















OBAMA

McCAIN


TOTAL
DONOR
Ranking
USD 000
Ranking
USD 000

USD 000







Largest Donor
1
1,618
1
375

1,993







Goldman Sachs
2
1,013
5
240

1,253
J P Morgan Chase
6
808
2
343

1,151
Citigroup
7
736
3
338

1,074
UBS
15
532
9
187

719






4,197










Here thanks to data supplied from Open Secrets, an excellent source of information are the results:
All these institutions are amongst the top ten largest contributors to BOTH candidates. “It is almost as though they did not care who won, so long as he was bought and paid for before reaching office”. Oh forget it; I’m sure that must be completely wrong!!

Maybe this also helps to explain that since taking office, we have not seen any criminal charges raised against top executives of any of these banks by the Obama White House.

UBS only number 15 in the Obama Donors league, with USD 532K, got the biggest fine of USD 780,000K. Perhaps there is a lesson to be learned in Zurich and Bern?

For anyone expecting “Hope and Change” with Romney, take a look at his donors list, it is all the usual suspects.